Web Survey Bibliography
Title There Is Hope for the Future: National Survey Results Reveal that Geriatric Medicine Fellows Are Well-Educated in End-of-Life Care
Author Pan, C. X., Carmody, S., Leipzig, R. M., Granieri, E., Sullivan, A., Block, S. D., Arnold, R. M.
Source Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 4, pp. 705-710
Year 2005
Database Ingenta Select
Access date 25.07.2005
Abstract Objectives: To assess the status of geriatric medicine (GM) fellows' training experiences in end-of-life care via self-report.
Design: Anonymous surveys completed by mail, Web access, and telephone.
Setting: U.S. accredited GM fellowship training programs.
Participants: Two hundred ninety-six surveys were sent to graduating GM fellows in 1- and 2-year programs across the Unites States.
Measurements: Measurements assessed self-reported attitudes, quantity and quality of end-of-life care education, preparation to provide care, and perceived value of caring for dying patients. Results: Response rate was 74%. Ninety-five percent or more of respondents held positive views about physicians' responsibility and ability to help dying patients. Seventy percent of fellows had completed a rotation focused on end-of-life care. Fellows who had done such rotations rated their end-of-life care education as highly as their overall geriatrics training. Fellows frequently received teaching in many end-of-life care topics, with lower rates of teaching how to say goodbye and responding to requests for assisted suicide. Overall, fellows felt well prepared to care for dying patients. Four factors independently predicted such preparedness: having had a palliative or end-of-life care rotation, being female, having been taught how to say goodbye to patients, and perceiving that it is important to attending physicians that fellows learn to care for dying patients. Conclusion: GM fellows feel their end-of-life care education is excellent and feel prepared to take care of dying patients. It is critical that geriatricians in training have access to and take advantage of palliative and end-of-life care rotations.
Design: Anonymous surveys completed by mail, Web access, and telephone.
Setting: U.S. accredited GM fellowship training programs.
Participants: Two hundred ninety-six surveys were sent to graduating GM fellows in 1- and 2-year programs across the Unites States.
Measurements: Measurements assessed self-reported attitudes, quantity and quality of end-of-life care education, preparation to provide care, and perceived value of caring for dying patients. Results: Response rate was 74%. Ninety-five percent or more of respondents held positive views about physicians' responsibility and ability to help dying patients. Seventy percent of fellows had completed a rotation focused on end-of-life care. Fellows who had done such rotations rated their end-of-life care education as highly as their overall geriatrics training. Fellows frequently received teaching in many end-of-life care topics, with lower rates of teaching how to say goodbye and responding to requests for assisted suicide. Overall, fellows felt well prepared to care for dying patients. Four factors independently predicted such preparedness: having had a palliative or end-of-life care rotation, being female, having been taught how to say goodbye to patients, and perceiving that it is important to attending physicians that fellows learn to care for dying patients. Conclusion: GM fellows feel their end-of-life care education is excellent and feel prepared to take care of dying patients. It is critical that geriatricians in training have access to and take advantage of palliative and end-of-life care rotations.
Access/Direct link Database (abstract)
Year of publication2005
Bibliographic typeJournal article
Web survey bibliography - 2005 (76)
- The ethics of research using electronic mail discussion groups; 2005; Kralik, D., Warren, J., Koch, T., Pignone, G., Price, K.
- The Analyses of Domestic Study about Internet Survey; 2005; Rui, L., Tie-ying, S.
- Controlling the Baseline Speed of Respondents: An Empirical Evaluation of Data Treatment Methods of...; 2005; Mayerl, J.
- Determinanten der Rücklaufquote in Online-Panels; 2005; Batanic, B., Moser, K.
- On the cost-efficiency of probability sampling based mail surveys with a Web response option; 2005; Werner, P.
- Expert workshop on mixed mode data collection in comparative social surveys; 2005; Roberts, C.
- The Effect Of A Simultaneous Mixed-Mode (Mail And Web) Survey On Respondent Characteristics And Survey...; 2005; Brennan, M.
- The total survey error approach. A guide to the new science of survey research; 2005; Weisberg, H. F.
- The professional respondent problem in online panel surveys today; 2005; Fulgoni, G.
- Satisficing behavior in online panelists; 2005; Downes-Le Guin, T.
- Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years; 2005; Liu, Z.
- Rating versus comparative trade-off measures. Trending changes in political issues across time and predictive...; 2005; Thomas, R. K., Behnke, S., Johnson, Al., Sanders, M.
- Publication bias: Recognizing the problem, understanding its origins and scope, and preventing harm; 2005; Dickersin, K.
- Panel proliferation and quality concerns; 2005; Faasse, J.
- Gricean effects in self-administered survey. Ph.D. Dissertation; 2005; Yan, T.
- Drop-down boxes, radio buttons, or fill-in-the-blank? Web survey scale-type effects; 2005
- Does weighting for nonresponse increase the variance of survey means?; 2005; Little, R. J., Vartivarian, S.
- Big scale observations gathered with the help of client side paradata; 2005; Haraldsen, G., Kleven, O., Sundvoll, A.
- User Interface Design and Evaluation ; 2005; Stone, D., Jarrett, C., Woodroffe, M., Minocha, S.
- Adding Value to Data Through Improved Access. The Case for Web Portals; 2005; Baker, R. P.
- Multi-Mode Research and Data Linkage. Theoretical and Practical Advice; 2005; Terhanian, G.
- Architectural Design of a Survey Questionnaire and Respondent Data Repository. Practical Considerations...; 2005; Cookson, P., Sobell, J.
- Developing and validating a nursing website evaluation questionnaire; 2005; Tsai, S. - L., Chai, S.-K.
- Workaround: Site’s surveys beat pop-up blockers, yield responses; 2005; Arnold, C.
- The Story of Subject Naught: A Cautionary but Optimistic Tale of Internet Survey Research; 2005; Konstan, J. A., Ross, M. W., Rosser, B. R. S., Stanton, J. M., Edwards, W. M.
- Standards in Online Surveys. Sources for Professional Codes of Conduct, Ethical Guidelines and Quality...; 2005; Kaczmirek, L., Schulze, N.
- Computer adaptive testing; 2005; Gershon, R. C.
- Ego control and ego-resiliency: Generalization of self-report scales based on personality descriptions...; 2005; Block, J., Funder, D. C., Letzring, T. D.
- The Web experiment list: A Web service for the recruitment of participants and archiving of Internet...; 2005; Reips, U. -D., Lengler, R.
- Survey of substance use among high school students in Taipei: Web-based questionnaire versus paper-and...; 2005; Wang, Y. C., Lee, C. M., Lew-Ting, C. Y., Hsiao, C. K., Chen, W. J.
- Web Surveys. A Brief Guide on Usability and Implementation Issues; 2005; Kaczmirek, L.
- An assessment of measurement invariance between online and mail surveys ; 2005; Deutskens, E., de Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M.
- E-mail versus Web survey response rates among health education professionals; 2005; Kittleson, M. J., Brown, S. L.
- Toward An Open-Source Methodology: What We Can Learn From The Blogosphere; 2005; M.
- Aux Abonnes Absents: Liste Rouge Et Telephone Portable Dans Les Enquetes En Population Generale Sur...; 2005; Beck, F., ., Peretti-Watel, P.
- Web Versus Paper Questionnares: A Design and Functionality - Comparison; 2005; Jones, Ja., Fraser, C., Dowling, Z.
- Web Surveys and the new Disability Discrimination Act; 2005; Macer, T.
- Mixed-mode Surveys Using Mail and Web Questionnaires; 2005; Meckel, M., Baugh, P., Walters, D.
- Sampling procedure, questionnaire design, online implementation; 2005; Jackob, N., Arens, J., Zerback, T., Jowell, R., de Rouvray, C.
- Simple Approaches to Estimating the Variance of the Propensity Score Weighted Estimator Applied on Volunteer...; 2005; Isaksson, A., Lee, S., de Rouvray, C.
- Simple Approaches to Estimating the Variance of the Propensity Score Weighted Estimator Applied on Volunteer...; 2005; Isaksson, A., Lee, S.
- Alternative Modes for Health Surveillance Surveys: An Experiment with Web, Mail, and Telephone; 2005; Link, M. W., Mokdad, A.
- An Experimental Comparison Of Web And Telephone Surveys; 2005; Fricker, S., Galesic, M., Tourangeau, R., Yan, T.
- Organizational Virtual Communities: Exploring Motivations Behind Online Panel Participation; 2005; Daugherty, T., Lee, W.-N., Gangadharbatla, H., Kim, K., Outhavong, S.
- Promoting Uniform Question Understanding in Today's and Tomorrow's Surveys; 2005; Conrad, F. G., Schober, M. F.
- Is a Web survey as effective as a mail survey? A field experiment among computer users; 2005; Kiernan, N. E., Kiernan, M., Oyler, M. A., Gilles, C.
- The effect of personalization on response rates and data quality in web surveys; 2005; Heerwegh, D., Vanhove, T., Matthijs, K., Loosveldt, G.
- When Methodology Interferes With Substance; 2005; Schoen, H., Faas, T.
- Web-based and Mailed Questionnaires: A Comparison of Response Rates and Compliance; 2005; Baelter, K., Balter, O., Fondell, E., Trolle-Lagerros, Y.
- Bleeding Edge or Proven Technology? The Fact and the Fiction of Mobile Survey Computing; 2005; Cameron, M. R.